A recognizable shape formed
Highs, lows, and zones lined up in a way that matches a named pattern's outline.
A head and shoulders, a double top, a triangle — these are shape names, not trading instructions. Learn to recognize them as candidates worth watching, and to separate a completed shape from a confirmed break.

Every classic pattern — head and shoulders, double top, triangle, flag — is really just a specific arrangement of the highs, lows, and reaction zones covered in earlier lessons. The name is convenient shorthand, but it doesn't add any new certainty beyond what those individual pieces of evidence already supported.
Highs, lows, and zones lined up in a way that matches a named pattern's outline.
The shape suggests one possible next-step scenario among others — not the only one.
Plenty of recognizable shapes never finish forming, or reverse before any breakout happens.
Each shape below is built from the same raw material: highs, lows, and a boundary zone. Read the candles first — the name is just what you call the arrangement once you can already describe it.
Price rallies to a first peak (the left shoulder), pulls back to a boundary, rallies higher to a second peak (the head), pulls back to roughly the same boundary again, then rallies to a third peak that stays below the head (the right shoulder). The line connecting the two pullback lows is the neckline — a zone, not one exact price. A close below it is the earliest evidence of a possible reversal, not proof of one.
Neckline drawn as a zone (95.1–96.1), not one exact price. Close below it is the earliest evidence, not a certainty.
Price rallies to a peak, pulls back once, then rallies again to a comparable peak before turning down. Two highs at roughly the same level with one pullback between them is the whole shape — nothing about it guarantees the second decline continues past the pullback low.
Two comparable peaks with one pullback between them. The pullback low is the reference zone, not a guarantee it holds.
An upper boundary stays roughly flat while the lows underneath it step progressively higher, squeezing the range narrower with each touch. That convergence describes shrinking room to move — it does not decide which side price eventually leaves from.
Flat top, rising lows converging toward it. Convergence describes a squeeze — it doesn't pick which side price leaves from.
A sharp, strong move (the flagpole) is followed by a short, narrow pullback that drifts gently against it (the flag). The pause is brief relative to the move that preceded it — but a pause is still just a pause, not a guarantee the prior move resumes once it ends.
Sharp flagpole, then a short down-sloping channel. A pause inside a move — not a guarantee the pole resumes.
Read each plain-language description first, then pick the pattern name that fits — the reveal explains what the shape does and doesn't tell you.
A peak, a higher peak, then a third peak roughly level with the first, with a connecting line beneath all three.
Head and shoulders, double tops, and double bottoms describe a possible change from one state to another — they still need the same evidence any state change would.
Triangles and flags describe a pause inside an existing move — they don't guarantee the prior move resumes once the pause ends.
Neither family is inherently more reliable — both are read using the same width, depth, and reaction-zone evidence from earlier lessons.
Whatever a pattern's reference line is called — a neckline, a trendline boundary, an upper or lower edge — it inherits every caveat already covered: it's drawn from chosen points, it has width rather than being one exact price, and crossing it once doesn't automatically confirm anything.
Identical price data — only how confidently the boundary is drawn changes.
Pick a case and judge how confirmed the break really is. More evidence should raise your confidence gradually — it shouldn't jump straight from "nothing" to "certain."
Some patterns come with a common rule of thumb for projecting a target distance after a breakout — for example, copying the pattern's height beyond the breakout point. That's a piece of geometry copied from history, not a law the market has to obey. Price can fall short, overshoot, or reverse well before reaching it.
The target is the pattern's own height copied below the breakout — a geometric guess, not a floor price has to reach.
Product, venue, timeframe, and session the shape was observed on.
Which specific highs, lows, or zone touches define the shape.
Where the neckline or edge sits, and how much width it has.
What would count as a close, a hold, or a retest — defined before the fact.
What would make you drop the pattern candidate entirely.
It repackages highs, lows, and zones you already know how to describe on their own.
A shape finishing forming is not the same fact as a level being closed beyond and held.
Projected distances are copied from a shape's own height, not guaranteed by any market rule.
Submit your answers to see detailed explanations.
Describe the shape, the boundary, and what happened afterward, and Mira can help separate what's confirmed from what's still just a candidate — it won't tell you the pattern guarantees an outcome.
Checking sign-in status...
Explain support/resistance as historical zones where buying or selling reactions occurred, and explain why a zone can fail and why a breakout doesn't guarantee continuation.