Position matches the plan
Confirmed against the sizing formula, not estimated by feel.
A sound entry rule, exit rule, and position size can still be undone by a wide spread, a surprise news release, or a rule condition that wasn't actually checked. A short pre-trade routine catches all three before the order goes in.

An execution checklist is a gate, not decoration. It verifies instrument, direction, order type, quantity, invalidation, costs, and known event risk before an order reaches the market.
Instrument, direction, order type, quantity, invalidation, and planned risk must all be explicit before the simulated ticket can be submitted.
A critical field is unresolved, so the order remains locked.
Every previous lesson in this module covered designing a good entry rule, exit rule, and testing process. None of that protects against a wide spread at the moment of entry, a scheduled news release about to hit, or an entry condition that wasn't actually double-checked before clicking the button. A short pre-trade checklist exists to catch exactly these gaps.
Confirmed against the sizing formula, not estimated by feel.
An unusually wide spread can quietly add to the effective cost of entry.
A scheduled release can add volatility the plan never accounted for.
Turn checks on and off and read what specific risk is left unmanaged when each one is skipped.
Missing this check: the position size may not actually match the intended 1R risk amount.
Missing this check: an unusually wide spread at that moment could quietly add to the effective cost of the trade.
Missing this check: a scheduled release could hit while the position is open, adding volatility the plan didn't account for.
Missing this check: the setup might not actually satisfy every condition the entry rule requires.
Checking the current spread, glancing at a news calendar, and confirming a position size against a formula each take only moments. The risk any one of them can catch — an inflated execution cost, an unplanned volatility spike, an incorrectly sized position — is disproportionately larger than the brief time the check requires.
Pick a case and judge what risk a skipped or completed check actually creates or avoids.
A trader places a market order during a low-liquidity period without checking the current spread first. Skipping the spread check risks an execution cost the trader didn't account for in their plan.
A trader opens a new position minutes before a scheduled high-impact economic release, without having checked the calendar. Skipping the news check means the position is exposed to volatility the trade plan never accounted for.
A trader confirms position size, checks the current spread, checks the news calendar, and verifies every entry condition before placing the order. Running the full checklist means the trade is entered with a complete view of risk, cost, and timing.
Does the position size match the sizing formula for this stop distance?
Is the current spread within a normal range for this instrument and session?
Is any scheduled high-impact release due while the position would be open?
Does the setup actually satisfy every stated entry condition?
Risk, spread, news, and rule conditions — run the same routine on every trade.
None of the four checks takes long relative to what it can catch.
Completing it means nothing avoidable was left to chance — it doesn't guarantee a win.
Submit your answers to see detailed explanations.
Describe how you currently prepare before placing a trade, and Mira can help you check it against these four boxes — it won't approve or place a trade for you.
Checking sign-in status...
Fold order type, liquidity, and event/overnight risk into the execution plan: order type should match the execution objective, and no single type is always better; liquidity and position size affect execution outcomes; when a holding spans a major event or overnight session, gap and slippage risk need to be built into the execution plan. Avoid absolute claims like 'market orders bad / limit orders good.'
A capstone-style closing lesson: when there's no setup, no-trade is a normal outcome, not a failure; unused cash/risk budget preserves future optionality, it isn't wasted; action itself isn't edge, and trade count isn't the goal. Doesn't teach 'trading less is always better' — take as many rule-compliant trades as there are rule-compliant opportunities, no more and no less.