Simple, consistent
Can leave an extended move on the table beyond the set distance.
An entry rule only defines half a trade. Fixed targets, trailing stops, time-based exits, and signal-based exits each trade off differently between capturing more of a move and protecting what's already been gained.

An exit rule defines how a trade ends before every new candle can renegotiate the decision. It may use invalidation, targets, time, or trailing conditions.
One trade enters at 100, invalidates at 94, and has a 108 target. Commit to the primary exit mechanism before seeing what happens next.
Choose the primary exit ruleA fixed target closes a trade at a set distance, simple but potentially leaving a bigger move on the table. A trailing stop follows the trade to lock in more gain as it develops, but can give some of that gain back before triggering. A time-based exit closes the trade when its thesis window ends, regardless of the current profit or loss. A signal-based exit ties the close to the same kind of explicit, checkable condition used for entries.
Can leave an extended move on the table beyond the set distance.
Can give back a real chunk of open profit before it triggers.
Switch between four exit types and read how each one balances capturing more of a move against protecting what's already been gained.
A profit target is set as a fixed distance from entry before the trade is placed, and the position closes there regardless of what happens after. Simple and consistent, but a fixed target can leave a bigger move on the table if price keeps running well beyond it.
A stop follows price at a set distance as the trade moves favorably, locking in more of the gain as the move continues. Captures more of an extended move, but can also give back a meaningful chunk of open profit before it triggers.
The position closes after a set amount of time has passed, regardless of profit or loss, because the original thesis was tied to a specific window. Keeps a trade from overstaying a thesis that no longer applies, but can also close out a trade that simply needed more time to work.
The position closes when a predefined chart condition appears — the same kind of explicit, checkable condition used for entries. Ties the exit to evidence rather than a fixed number, but only works as well as the entry rule it's built on.
The previous module covered why widening a stop specifically because price is approaching it reframes the plan after the fact. The same logic applies to profit targets: moving a target further away because the move "feels like it has more room" replaces a decision made in advance with a reaction to the current moment.
Pick a case and judge whether the exit reflects a predefined rule or a reaction to how the trade currently feels.
As price approaches a trader's planned profit target, they move the target further away because the move feels like it has more room to run. Moving the target after the fact reframes a plan-based decision as a reaction to how the trade feels in the moment.
As a position moves favorably, a trader's stop rises with it at a fixed distance, locking in more of the gain with each step. This reflects a predefined trailing-stop rule applied consistently as the trade develops.
A trader closes a position at a predetermined time because the original thesis was tied to a specific event window that has now passed, even though the trade shows a small paper loss. This reflects a predefined time-based exit rule tied to the thesis, not a reaction to the current profit or loss.
Fixed target, trailing stop, time-based, or signal-based — decided before entry.
Is the specific number or condition written down, not left to feel?
If the exit can move, what specific new evidence justifies moving it?
Would the same exit rule apply the same way on the next ten trades?
None of the four captures more of a move without giving up something else.
A number decided in advance is a rule; the same number moved mid-trade is an improvisation.
The same principle from stop-setting applies to profit targets too.
Submit your answers to see detailed explanations.
Describe your entry rule and trade timeframe, and Mira can help you compare how each exit type would have handled a described scenario — it won't tell you when to exit a specific open position.
Checking sign-in status...
Closes out the exit framework: exit isn't just two buttons — 'stop loss' and 'take profit' — it also includes invalidation exit, target exit, trailing rules, partial exits, and time-based exits; different exit logic serves different strategies, and no single type is absolutely best; changing an exit needs verifiable new evidence or a predefined rule — it can't be changed arbitrarily.
Understand that the market doesn't know your cost basis; the current decision should compare future risk against future opportunity; break-even fixation lets a past price hold the current decision hostage. Your entry price matters for account records, but shouldn't alone decide where the price goes or why you keep holding.